Sunday, January 30, 2022

A Black Female Supreme

 

  When President Biden declares that he will nominate a Black Woman for a vacant position on the US Supreme Court, he is making a racist, sexist statement.  Sorry all you well-meaning liberals, but that is a fact.  To limit the field of contenders by ruling out male or Caucasian contenders takes away the most desirable attribute of “best qualified.”  I’m not saying that a Black Woman could not be the best qualified nominee.  It is just that color or sex has little to do with the issue.  

   What of the concept that the Court should mirror the population in its distribution of race and sex?  Is that a legitimate goal?  Well, yes I suppose it is, but it should tend to do just that without racism and sexism involved.  So avoid those pitfalls.  Don’t declare that the next appointed Supreme Court Justice will be a Black Female.  It is not how a just America should function.  “Just” needs to be an important consideration in our justice system.

  Look at it from the standpoint of “The End Justifying The Means.”  Can having a Black woman on the Court by only encouraging Black women to apply and only considering Black women for appointment possibly be a good transaction?  Well, my take on that philosophy is, “We live in the means and die in the end.”  In other words our devious thoughts and actions are never justified by the chance of a desirable outcome.  Bad methods are unlikely to win the ball game.

   It would be nice to see a Black Woman be our next justice appointed to the Supreme Court, but I would see it open to all and have that person be the best qualified of the applicants.  Sex and color are not valid qualifications.  If mirroring the population is the primary consideration for Court appointment, let’s consider groups with no representation on the Court, like Orientals and Gays.

Cheers, Old Buz     1/30/2022

Iambloggerbuz.blogspot.com

Friday, January 7, 2022

White Privilege

 

   I am a “white” person, but I would be proud to have a racist call me a WINO (White In Name Only).  You see, I don’t believe that skin pigmentation has anything to do with who an individual is.  As to my “white privilege,” I don’t believe that I have any privileges due to the color of my skin.  What I do have is the rights and privileges that our country claims to offer to all of its citizens.  Equal treatment under the law and by the society has always been mine, but hardly ever given to people of other than white skin tone.  Our society has always screwed people of color and treated me as promised.  What is called white privilege is not a privilege at all.  It is a right promised to all citizens of our nation.

   The time to keep our word is long overdue.  In my lifetime I have never voted after standing in a line of over ten people.  That is not what I see in the news for people of color.  Black leaders and spokespeople are now asking for federal legislation to stop voter suppression and vote subversion by officials.  Voter inequity by states is not a black issue, as is claimed.  It is an issue of a challenged democracy.  The Republican target is the voting power of Democrats, not people of color.  Black people are simply an easy target.  As an ethic group, they reliably vote Democrat and they are often ghettoized (made an easy target of zoning).  When people of color are disabled in their voting rights, your group will be next.  So back color blind voting regulation and let your voice be heard.  When voting rights are controlled by one political party, it will not be easy to turn our system of government around and you will no longer have anything similar to a democracy.

   Our US Senate recently came together and voted in a non-partisan vote (85% in favor) to spend more dollars on our military in 2022 than the next ten nations in the world combined spend.  Yet they cannot come together in a non-partisan manner to ensure equal voting rights for all of our citizens.  Is there a problem with our government and the people we elect to office?

   Donald Trump once said, “When all of the nation can vote by mail, no more Republicans will be elected.”  He was often wrong, but he had this one right.  Actually it has nothing to do with mail.  It has only to do with more people voting.  Republicans would rarely win if our democracy was fully functioning and more of our population voted.  The “Party of No” does not represent the people and it offers them nothing.  To be able to win the Republicans would need to change their mission to conservative change and conservative economics.  This would not be a hard pill to swallow for most thinking Republicans.  Thinking, honest Republicans are presently a small minority of their membership, but a change in the party to benefit all, would be a welcome and a popular shift.  Honest, thinking Republicans have been forced out of the party, but they need to take it back for the good of the nation.  

Cheers, Old Buz, proud to be a WINO         1/7/2022

Iambloggerbuz.blogspot.com

Friday, December 31, 2021

The Boulder Fires 12/31/2021

      

   As most of you know, I am a graduate of The University of Colorado Boulder, class of 1965.  This would make me an expert on the presently burning Boulder Fire.  With the 100 mph winds in the area and the persistent drought, the fire itself is hard to follow.  I have no vehicle capable of sustaining that speed.

   The real threat to the University is to the athletic stadiums and The Sink (drinking hole).  I worked at The Sink for my Jr. & Sr. years at Colorado and as you well know this establishment is the #2 beer outlet in the nation (primarily Coors, a local product).  Ron De Santis with his U of Miami has the #1 spot.  With athletics being placed before academics in our state institutions of higher learning, across the nation, you can be assured that the stadiums will be up and running long before classrooms will be restored.  And if you are worried about The Sink, rest assured, The University of Colorado, long claimed to be the #1 party school in America, will quickly be up and running.  If you don’t have 3.2% beer available at your state’s universities, you might look into it.  Alcohol consumption can rival the Lottery for state income.  Help drinking become the #2 sport at your university.  Do it for God and Country.

Keep Athletics & Entertainment Strong, Old Buz

“I don’t listen to the experts.  I listen to my gut.” – Donald Trump, 45th President of The U.S.

P.S. Thoughts and prayers are a far better way to handle the drought than desalinization would be.  I.e. Go after the effects not the cause or cure.  “God Bless America”  On the pandemic: "Thank "Q" for sharing."

Iambloggerbuz.blogspot.com

"Go Buffalo"

Friday, December 24, 2021

Who Are We?

 

   Our US Senate just passed an annual military spending bill for $768.2 billion, over ¾ of a trillion dollars, sent to it by the House of Representatives.  It is ready to be signed by our president and he most likely will sign it.  You see, it truly has bipartisan support.  85% of the Senate voted for this military budget.  It is over $24 billion more than the Pentagon requested.  The Senate can’t come together on voting rights, healthcare or education.  Each side of the aisle votes like a rubber stamp, against the other, but on annual military spending, it is all cum-by-yah in our government.  Why is that when we currently spend more than the next 10 nations combined on our military?  Democrats and Republican representatives sure love military spending.  We increased the amount after pulling out of a 20 year shooting war.  One of the reasons given for the Afghanistan pull out was “military spending.”  Is it possible that in the first five years of that war we had accomplished our reason for being there and for the next 15 years, the purpose was military spending?

   When President Eisenhower left office in 1961 he warned of “The Military/Industrial Complex” threatening the nation.  It no longer threatens.  It is our nation.  For those of you born after 1961, it seems normal and therefore perfectly OK.  How does the above vote jive with the concept of a “Christian Nation?”  Could it be that we are delusional in our national emphasis on maintaining a giant military?  In that respect, is our nation morally blind and perhaps not “One Nation Under God?”  On the other hand, the first ¾ of The Holy Bible, a popular mythological novel, presents a militaristic God, but the last ¼ talks about a “Prince of Peace.” 

   Perhaps on this eve of brotherly love we could rejoice and be thankful for our elected representatives coming together, in a non-partisan way to keep America free (but not necessarily with all of us voting).  There will always be time to build back better and we can worry about maintenance of infrastructure tomorrow.

Christmas Cheers, Old Buz   12/24/2021


Friday, December 3, 2021

Abortion & The Law


   There are mediating factors between abortion and the law.  The two primary ones are morality and science.  Semantics tend to get involved too.  Some might call the termination of a pregnancy a murder.  I wouldn’t strenuously object to the use of the term.  It is the willful termination of a human life.  I hate to admit it, but the Catholics got it right on this one.  “Life begins at the time of conception.”  The embryo is certainly alive and is it not the first stage of a human individual?   Put out enough religion based moral decrees and sooner or later you are bound to get one right.

   The embryo, fetus, unborn child, baby are all the same critter.  They are stages of development.  The same is true of the twenty year old water skier and the eighty year old in assisted living.  It is the same human in a different stage of life’s journey.  And how is it different to end this human life at 13 weeks than it is at 25weeks?  The mother and her doctor are deciding to end a human life in either case.  An embryo is not a chicken or a lizard.  The acorn is part of the life story of the mighty oak.  Same critter, at a different stage in its development.

   Fetal viability is an odd concept to be used in laws governing abortion rights.  For one thing, ending a life at 19 weeks isn’t a whole lot different than ending one at 20 weeks.  For another what does viability refer to?  A baby born in a well-equipped hospital can be born premature, in the last trimester and still have a good chance of survival.  Not so good for a baby born at home and delivered by a mid-wife.   I believe that this early birth technology will be developed to a point where an embryo can be on high-tech life support through gestation.  What will that do to the definition of “fetal viability”?

   When the pro-abortion women claim something like, “My body.  My choice.”  I believe they are somewhat incorrect.  They are housing and feeding another human being.  That is who they claim the decision of life or death over.  Perhaps they have that right.  Not because it is their body, but because it is their possession and they have the right to end its life.  A woman surely has a better right to kill her unborn than a man has to fly half way around the world to kill a stranger, afforded by his membership in the military.  I would guess that the best captain to guide a moral rudder would be the half-bred child of The Golden Rule and reason.

   So, to me, the best three guiding factors for considering an abortion would be:  is the child wanted, is the child the result of a rape and what are the pending health ramifications for the mother and the child in child birth?  There needs to be the nationally legal, over the counter availability of a cheap “morning after” pill.  This pill would result in the least guilt for the woman and the least pain for an unlikely embryo.  On the morning after, there would be very little embryo awareness even if there were an embryo.  Possibly less awareness of pain than grass has when you mow your lawn.

Merry Christmas, Old Buz       12/03/2021      

iambloggerbuz.blogspot.com 

Wednesday, November 24, 2021

Science Lemmings


   Science Lemmings pretty much follow the philosophy of any other group of lemmings.  Lemming groups are represented by such groups as Religious Lemmings, Political Party Lemmings, Family Lemmings and Patriotic Lemmings.  The members of lemming groups don’t primarily think as individuals.  They follow a respected leader.  Some call it faith.  The Science Lemmings once believed that the sun circled the Earth.  This belief was shared by the Religious Lemmings and pretty much everyone else.  It was a popular belief.  By observing the sun from the Earth each day, there was little reason to question the belief.  Belief changes with time, unless it is religious belief.

   Science Lemmings of today pretty much universally believe in The Big Bang Theory.  My understanding of the theory is that about 35 billion years ago a bit of matter, the size of a pinhead exploded BANG and from this explosion the material universe was created.  It has the feel to me of something from nothing, or nearly nothing to everything in the universe.  My experience when questioning anyone in the Science Lemming group is that they believe in big bang, but they can’t actually explain the transaction.  They cannot produce the mathematical formula behind the theory and if they could I probably wouldn’t understand it.

   Neil deGrasse Tyson did say in a Video that I watched that he did believe in the Big Bang Theory and when asked where it took place, he said here, where the Earth is now.  He further explained that anywhere in the universe where the theory is applied, will be the point of origin of the big bang.  I would guess that Neil has a working understanding of the formula.  So the exact location of the bang was anywhere and everywhere.  That is a problem for me.  How could it be?

   Tyson is a very bright man.  I believe that the Science Lemmings may have one small error in their formula.  I see them as tracking awareness, not matter.  That would say that at the moment that life began anywhere, awareness began and awareness is of the Universe.  I don’t know if not living objects have awareness, but I would guess that they don’t.  The concept that the existence of matter requires awareness is not new to Buddhists, but I don’t know that the Buddhist Lemmings associate their beliefs with the Big Bang Theory.  I would offer this concept to the Buddhists, but they probably have no faith in me.  Ho hum.

Cheers, Old Buz   11/24/2021

Iambloggerbuz.blogspot.com


Tuesday, October 26, 2021

One Vote

 

   I believe in democracy.  We in America don’t have one.  Our government is slightly democratic, but so flawed in its basic governing rules and procedures, that it doesn’t function that way.  It gives the effectivness of some voters way more sway than the votes of other voters.  A democratic goal is primarily thwarted by the financial influence exerted on both sides of the aisle.  Secondly, it is thwarted by herd mentality of our two party system.  Our ancestors didn’t fight a revolution to make that the case.  In the best democracy possible, each citizen’s vote would count the same as any other.  That should be our goal and if “we the people” care about it … we need to make it so.

   Largely, our elected representatives are not public servants.  They are Party servants.  Their goal is not improving American lives or the nation itself.  It is improving Party power.  To prove this to yourself you need only watch the vote counts.  Each Party accuses the other of voting like a rubber stamp and in both cases it is true.  Let a representative use their own wisdom and conscience in deciding their vote and they will be attacked and eaten by their fellow Party members.  Examples would be Joe Manchin and Kyrsten Sinema for the Democrats or Liz Cheney and Mitt Romney for the Republicans.  The voters of each herd mentality, you folks, are all too happy to follow the Party leader’s lead.  Wouldn’t it be a better world if both we and our representatives thought for ourselves?  I would have no objection to a “filibuster”, 60% requirement to pass legislation, if each representative used their own mind, without party influence.  It would bring about meaningful debate and thoughtful votes.  60% is not an unreasonable requirement for changing a law or the direction of the country.  But two rubber stamp groups, evenly split, will accomplish little.  Our present government has been proving that for decades.

  So, what needs changing?  Start by abolishing political parties and the lobbyists who bribe them.  Do away with political action committees.  The Supreme Court, in their action called Citizens United, corrupted the PACs beyond repair.  In a final election for any office the candidate must get the majority of individual votes from those they represent.  A president, holding a federal office would receive the majority of the votes cast in the nation.  In other words, let’s close the Electoral College.  States and voting districts would only be responsible for counting votes, in a federal election, not determining a winner.  The same concept would be applied to the office holders of a state.  To be elected, they would need the majority of voters in their state to vote for them, in the final election.  No campaign funds would enter the state from outside of the state and only individual citizens could contribute a limited amount to any campaign.  No more corporate or union donations or any other group donation.  The ability to make a small political donation should be a perk that only an individual citizen has.  “We The People.”

   One more bad tooth needs pulling.  It is the U.S. Senate.  This is a group that is anti-democratic by design.  No one disputes the fact that a citizen living in Wyoming (Pop. 581,075) has over 68 times the legislative representation of a citizen living in California (Pop. 39,613,493) in our U.S. Senate.  Each state has but 2 senators.  This may have been a good design when the Constitution was written, but it has no relevance today.  “State’s Rights” has grown grotesque.  Any piece of beneficial legislation can be stopped by this little unrepresentative group.  A two year term of office for a House of Representatives member needs to be expanded to four year terms and the Senators need to be put on a bus out of town.  Let’s make ours a democracy, for the people and do it right.

(By the way … when a nation decides not to pay its debts … the nation has failed.  Why would we choose to fail?)

OUR POLITICAL PARTY SYSTEM HAS OUTLIVED ITS USEFULNESS.

This I believe, Old Buz   10/25/2021

Iambloggerbuz.blogspot.com